[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted libclc 0.2.0+git20160907-4 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 20:04:26 +0300
Source: libclc
Binary: libclc-ptx libclc-amdgcn libclc-r600 libclc-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.0+git20160907-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenCL team <pkg-opencl-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org>
Description:
 libclc-amdgcn - OpenCL C language implementation - amdgcn support
 libclc-dev - OpenCL C language implementation - development files
 libclc-ptx - OpenCL C language implementation - ptx support
 libclc-r600 - OpenCL C language implementation - r600 support
Closes: 857591
Changes:
 libclc (0.2.0+git20160907-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Andreas Boll ]
   * Team upload.
   * Add a patch to fix the functions get_global_size, get_local_size and
     get_num_groups on amdgcn with LLVM 3.9 (closes: #857591).
Checksums-Sha1:
 1d2c6664a7b8fb096792d6e756f9c1051da1971f 2174 libclc_0.2.0+git20160907-4.dsc
 f87c671629400d96d998c5d910106c90ff591cc7 5092 libclc_0.2.0+git20160907-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 77649173d14f7a958e9974b85fbd889c4c2b23839b989971d47316e9386a556c 2174 libclc_0.2.0+git20160907-4.dsc
 496b3cd6ff194694fdb7421141840051b81b8651880a0538de7ec9a3eca83063 5092 libclc_0.2.0+git20160907-4.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 7d1e94c14ce46595fa150d87d68d996b 2174 libs extra libclc_0.2.0+git20160907-4.dsc
 49d23d8f41f059bb180caac8a4468326 5092 libs extra libclc_0.2.0+git20160907-4.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=ncWI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: