Accepted flatpak 0.9.1+git20170403.1-2 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 00:04:39 +0100
Source: flatpak
Binary: flatpak flatpak-builder flatpak-tests gir1.2-flatpak-1.0 libflatpak-dev libflatpak-doc libflatpak0
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.1+git20170403.1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Utopia Maintenance Team <pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Description:
flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
flatpak-builder - Flatpak application building helper
flatpak-tests - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (tests)
gir1.2-flatpak-1.0 - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (introspection)
libflatpak0 - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (library)
libflatpak-dev - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (development)
libflatpak-doc - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (documentation)
Changes:
flatpak (0.9.1+git20170403.1-2) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Build with large file support, fixing FTBFS on 32-bit
architectures when gpgme detects a mismatch
* Correct some format strings on 32-bit architectures
Checksums-Sha1:
1578d0efc6719e1ded1f89553296a526f86d46b6 3165 flatpak_0.9.1+git20170403.1-2.dsc
8b62ae5fc679dc4ca81be927eabef1ac8ad89c71 17568 flatpak_0.9.1+git20170403.1-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
0875f9b7f244502f8333dc82f16cdaf7e924edf8af4af89b3b0506503013c6bf 3165 flatpak_0.9.1+git20170403.1-2.dsc
38ddcab943547036d37cc4bffeae93e6748ee9cf61d50b2991f564dd309f933d 17568 flatpak_0.9.1+git20170403.1-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
ded1efb349bc3cecedc7a8efeca75885 3165 admin optional flatpak_0.9.1+git20170403.1-2.dsc
5189d9a3565ef11891b189bebdb26e61 17568 admin optional flatpak_0.9.1+git20170403.1-2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=wRgC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: