[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted shadowsocks-libev 2.6.0+ds-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 23:55:09 +0900
Source: shadowsocks-libev
Binary: shadowsocks-libev libshadowsocks-libev-dev libshadowsocks-libev2
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6.0+ds-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>
Description:
 libshadowsocks-libev-dev - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy (development files)
 libshadowsocks-libev2 - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy (shared library)
 shadowsocks-libev - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy
Changes:
 shadowsocks-libev (2.6.0+ds-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Revert obfuscating function added since v2.6.0,
     due to it's already dropped by upstream, and won't be
     supported in the future.
   * debian/patches:
     - Add revert patch and refresh patches.
   * debian/copyright:
     - Add new entry of copyright on src/base64.{c,h}
     - Update copyright year.
Checksums-Sha1:
 4f21a7f141c8b481b3ba969b13497bad999cadf6 2379 shadowsocks-libev_2.6.0+ds-2.dsc
 7106017e05700cb5effc74f31f3dba3b9407b304 32212 shadowsocks-libev_2.6.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 b6a72cf8af6b1e62babab68f426d21489839961e45629b3d960f816b9dffd1d8 2379 shadowsocks-libev_2.6.0+ds-2.dsc
 51edf99d76d2c2b5be0349b759976146433df877383a3c525e0890ff61988564 32212 shadowsocks-libev_2.6.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 b403c2093ef659825ecab2b69a63f649 2379 net extra shadowsocks-libev_2.6.0+ds-2.dsc
 5a830dde1dbfa38aba7d42e866d1b269 32212 net extra shadowsocks-libev_2.6.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJLBAEBCgA1FiEEL6/rtS9fXc5VcNLmbGrNZBezrLEFAlhuYOQXHHJvZ2Vyc2hp
bWl6dUBnbWFpbC5jb20ACgkQbGrNZBezrLGDnA//TRUdkw1cbmEvD9LQV5LRmzgU
QQH9A3+qCfO9cGgGixExhkOD6sLQpf3LxAFbC5akSaoq7ZsUeLDA0pMaMVzula1+
PtMurB0uv5j//T3EX36kUoKKZrssPFv4RYaagJeDlQ8l3yHQKdNIvpzMvXzx2XxX
8ks2PHw8DH/hpNr9cAyEH+oAOU1FLzMYWFyKgF+pmq96IRXaQqtIFIkQvwJ5Mpz1
zh0UHioxjR+C7O/JMbqKVry19Dw6vpdNpWBFbP8xXW9nOpWvdNNkInii+VP/fj6k
TLek5ucBoJUPvim8m8QJtBazakzcfHYX7X5178lXJn6ekqt66LeFYVQ0ZAlbdT1U
gPX2uQqAqtMtZGQG0JQ5oxMlOTYtmCQRgVFulXwttk0uIwOGqNVKtAZgiQY8TyoS
sTKReLtkHbVEW5grCFwP1keqJDNtpTcLheyaYDrXybi2IsO4eTKKQPcK7765ra0e
QaWo0LiEI2+dtcvzN2GskTvGKmzQRjdYCIij03WDyDF9OqB6dfrpOXlq3qyKf4sU
i2Z8suWMIwDcXhYm7nfwWybkdQ8H+V7OBC/aT6xxKigAP0JxFyHGWVLvxHYo8CXN
gDQmdH3/1SvXVpWvA3TozL1gelMJb/Fx0FYBKxmi/DgrAyABHsfyPdqrPe+dv+KT
dr48OggaaS5dRlIJPv4=
=qWur
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: