Accepted ruby-jeweler 2.0.1-3 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:32:30 +0800
Source: ruby-jeweler
Binary: ruby-jeweler
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andrew Lee (李健秋) <andrew.lee@collabora.co.uk>
Description:
ruby-jeweler - Opinionated tool for creating and managing RubyGem projects
Closes: 830147
Changes:
ruby-jeweler (2.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/control: drop ruby-bluecloth dependency as it's obsoleted.
(Closes: #830147)
Checksums-Sha1:
31999881c0bf119f8280476ba2a42cb0cae61d20 2118 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3.dsc
45976b730701d43871ee5331dfbf342e91e9adc3 2476 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3.debian.tar.xz
9433ef1293a69cc10b44c40e92965756cf33b5a1 27698 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3_all.deb
2237b274c43b32883e036c3192e87c469fddcafb 7094 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
b2e4d7fa94cddaf27f407516b0224c314f85d4bcc3e879f8cd6bc8c03dbafdbe 2118 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3.dsc
81693af1ce22b160305be296de8760ce35d67d20f4bf70382bbd66343b857394 2476 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3.debian.tar.xz
3893b17313ca0a9bf25ccbe24f3e14d909b6a359f23b5ef66efb543f0cc69fdc 27698 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3_all.deb
5530baa991d413bcba103f875ff74baf8dcd12f397f1befe9ab503ac0cf2d817 7094 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
5b6792a08b502a03866dc7bb2f912517 2118 ruby optional ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3.dsc
0152f5db9b6eb5dcfb50f259faf5f15a 2476 ruby optional ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3.debian.tar.xz
f2e365b87cbcc22f986e5fcf4e2331a7 27698 ruby optional ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3_all.deb
a6b65205bb849962d66d941f1f16d785 7094 ruby optional ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=4fUJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: