Accepted flatpak 0.6.14-3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:42:45 +0000
Source: flatpak
Binary: flatpak flatpak-builder flatpak-tests gir1.2-flatpak-1.0 libflatpak-dev libflatpak-doc libflatpak0
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6.14-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Utopia Maintenance Team <pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Description:
flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
flatpak-builder - Flatpak application building helper
flatpak-tests - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (tests)
gir1.2-flatpak-1.0 - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (introspection)
libflatpak0 - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (library)
libflatpak-dev - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (development)
libflatpak-doc - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (documentation)
Changes:
flatpak (0.6.14-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* d/tests/*: only run tests on a real or virtual machine, not in a
container. bubblewrap is effectively already a container, and
nesting containers doesn't work particularly well.
Unfortunately this means the tests won't work on ci.debian.net,
which uses LXC.
Checksums-Sha1:
538546782d454e849f5c1a1abe122a71b1e754f5 2989 flatpak_0.6.14-3.dsc
55cdfc07805176fd72ec0e769221fe37a34b7c01 13772 flatpak_0.6.14-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
830d006a522cf1baacaed50292c76613959b3f2837837f494a5548598a2fb596 2989 flatpak_0.6.14-3.dsc
d83a2da77e6956e87eff168a560ceda8d29c34702703a65dfa50a924c122628e 13772 flatpak_0.6.14-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
2c0c4e8a231bd451bb2650d3abda756d 2989 admin optional flatpak_0.6.14-3.dsc
b23357aac0893bed00e5203dc1d5525d 13772 admin optional flatpak_0.6.14-3.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=D1Zc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: