Accepted postmark 1.53-2 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 20:38:07 +0200
Source: postmark
Binary: postmark
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.53-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Noël Köthe <noel@debian.org>
Changed-By: Noël Köthe <noel@debian.org>
Description:
postmark - File system benchmark from NetApp
Closes: 437783
Changes:
postmark (1.53-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* removed strip in upstream Makefile. closes: #437783
* debian/control updated Standard-Version to 3.9.8, no changes needed
* debian/compat updated to 9
* debian/rules cleanup
Checksums-Sha1:
12a76b989851d29f32d85feb169d10d4fbd4f2c7 1610 postmark_1.53-2.dsc
f1c9cf7d743f28441a7b64650b935307bfd63c61 5113 postmark_1.53-2.diff.gz
d9d43fb69268e10956ab55a7b91be0c600f2013c 16910 postmark-dbgsym_1.53-2_amd64.deb
5314cc35a792b8f2c2ef0926bb5495b0b69bcd5b 15350 postmark_1.53-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
b95c2516b4cd9ccf292417807ff81bf36ec98366b0e465cfcaad82bdca1d3588 1610 postmark_1.53-2.dsc
9c48786687983cf65c7871cbb81370f7c6b0d7711cdc45eb04f86e80ea1c0119 5113 postmark_1.53-2.diff.gz
eec3730fedc9681f736bb30abfa713f91e4933b74f21825df4b0da4876890537 16910 postmark-dbgsym_1.53-2_amd64.deb
a673bd9df442c66ea47603c3e1d41acc6507f3c61f0a7e96e68d67b127b07b62 15350 postmark_1.53-2_amd64.deb
Files:
d7194e395c8d0b18f91244298046c412 1610 utils extra postmark_1.53-2.dsc
daff4a37a9dfbadaff89e77b8901f293 5113 utils extra postmark_1.53-2.diff.gz
07f6409bc2c677ba8580259c2d3e0526 16910 debug extra postmark-dbgsym_1.53-2_amd64.deb
bddf84db4d5f773c2d488f1d5bf72bdd 15350 utils extra postmark_1.53-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXeWExAAoJEGjAeL6I+Azat2oQAL5TQLsm1cEAXkfGDLa2jGMw
nQ60Y2+jq0y3PGcXUmWq2rFW+INl2X/9gS+NRElGUWBzbMA/Cb2DoDRb30zAOsFR
rMGZR0weFEM8k9X59R1CXzPVUlF36Bdl6J32dy2ceHwRepzDxx/r4Bo2PlctILGa
9g+gIPtvVaJrHVprOY2Dh1IOVHeDQwU2BIIaNFK4zUU1bfAjOiY+pZRVp55NYeoP
QMIsWfyk1S+9jqC0Lp6iYWWakhx4252J1tZ1krQ8wK07b9dD6ybZzO57G1W3tUoE
ysfQ1MDqlfaCmhUmVrihQ5D9efCZUENb9wzVKAAH7MHShNSlmTn2ef9qvAwb5H6v
5qW2E+HcSt4lFUT2RKurYBEXIvHWsSQ3Y7h9kxQLUMGO2F5S4o3O8qt+7UhFcbpE
GQsOMlQeTpX3nCDWqymuMAo7TIczXHNaDD9y4SpTposK8FsJJq1Uv3PjEQW0cJOa
AL6ZN4fkVJMa8efa0NAFvKCUbTnmyTzHwRxlIcRHAQ376Nu5PrhMIyBPeH5thiO6
RjSeUU4fQcnipu1mvwqoqDRpKYJTNsqrswE7vESFp1u5rrPg0aLWrgVFyUYCXhmo
RpdYUzJSedhIt/QLRZpg4UUogYtVx+6i6eALDuulU4NWCvGa8jT+l8wNfdgYKwEw
qdFbgFRlC3AYwLSiYxhG
=taPi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: