Accepted tcpreplay 3.4.4-3 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 20:02:26 +0200
Source: tcpreplay
Binary: tcpreplay
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.4.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Noël Köthe <noel@debian.org>
Changed-By: Noël Köthe <noel@debian.org>
Description:
tcpreplay - Tool to replay saved tcpdump files at arbitrary speeds
Closes: 796691 829350
Changes:
tcpreplay (3.4.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* extend the long description with the included executables to
make them searchable with apt. closes: #796691
* added enforce-maxpacket.patch. Thanks Christoph. closes: #829350
* debian/compat moved to debhelper 9
* debian/control raised Standards-Version no changes needed
* debian/rules added hardening to the build
Checksums-Sha1:
3201dba8e341b8f7b14f3928948e2fd5cf4f3a2d 1766 tcpreplay_3.4.4-3.dsc
2d3d822a0b77dabbfb763002ac8283462979f8b9 6340 tcpreplay_3.4.4-3.debian.tar.xz
d963cb7a715d13a9da3b939a360afbf12bb46ff1 1094556 tcpreplay-dbgsym_3.4.4-3_amd64.deb
37a3bbf83202a724f44b5f8061998af11d3dd344 217850 tcpreplay_3.4.4-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
427c286e3596c012838d710e4b2605d69ee11d11e1abe140a65367d71b63ca2f 1766 tcpreplay_3.4.4-3.dsc
ea7e913740a6d3461c917181d608d1cfc5c1e5b08550c49e78ed578c326bd35f 6340 tcpreplay_3.4.4-3.debian.tar.xz
024b49cd6ed58d1da44487495deaca852b9ca6c289dcce610e28735647b0adbc 1094556 tcpreplay-dbgsym_3.4.4-3_amd64.deb
5c56a8799f9adc3b1a390cc973fd238d7c0123346479b5436c0c49ea52108c30 217850 tcpreplay_3.4.4-3_amd64.deb
Files:
4f9dc0d6bb8d3ca2d888c37e3c7efcc1 1766 net optional tcpreplay_3.4.4-3.dsc
f612402c8263e6af5cf9dc1e92825ab0 6340 net optional tcpreplay_3.4.4-3.debian.tar.xz
34c67f5ba122eed02227de821cedc99e 1094556 debug extra tcpreplay-dbgsym_3.4.4-3_amd64.deb
2f313a0cd1480640cc3040b49beafc32 217850 net optional tcpreplay_3.4.4-3_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=HCYu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: