Accepted ncftp 2:3.2.5-2 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 19:19:28 +0200
Source: ncftp
Binary: ncftp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2:3.2.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Noël Köthe <noel@debian.org>
Changed-By: Noël Köthe <noel@debian.org>
Description:
ncftp - User-friendly and well-featured FTP client
Closes: 352425 666352 829249
Changes:
ncftp (2:3.2.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* acknowledge the NMU: Thanks Jakub and Lucas! closes: #666352
* debian/compat "raised" to compat 9
* added reproducible patch. Thanks Reiner closes: #829249
* fixed rmdir with trailing /. Thanks Bart closes: #352425
* updated to Standard-Version 3.9.8. removed debian/menu
* fixed lintian hardening-no-*
* fixed lintian maintainer-script-without-set-e
* added debian/watch
Checksums-Sha1:
e458500cbec3e911987babd17daeeeb6d28c5b94 1695 ncftp_3.2.5-2.dsc
ecfe5810419649921f94a0bc3a6cb6381acc69e4 9616 ncftp_3.2.5-2.debian.tar.xz
904674ee26c937359f4f7b510f143e8f9ed99966 1392946 ncftp-dbgsym_3.2.5-2_amd64.deb
b86d9ba1d93e1a249522a16e1a83840bff07cdf8 284492 ncftp_3.2.5-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
95c17f93b93966dcedaece5c3e001d446b09e2e8cd501d5550a5886684ae81c6 1695 ncftp_3.2.5-2.dsc
957b58988ee540d3f1d5699f38621a6cd853a12b992f48e8307cd4196e347b33 9616 ncftp_3.2.5-2.debian.tar.xz
a5aec842d82bbe7d2bf0b34ba6540dd441811d4a729bf4c4bda7918ffb23124c 1392946 ncftp-dbgsym_3.2.5-2_amd64.deb
85f01808f3d18dc764f2fcf1be9d6f37d8e1a0b5b28b38a792759532b47cda7f 284492 ncftp_3.2.5-2_amd64.deb
Files:
bd71446fd335e530da49fc27d49f3908 1695 net optional ncftp_3.2.5-2.dsc
490bd595dd6d7667b5625c4c7bbf8301 9616 net optional ncftp_3.2.5-2.debian.tar.xz
9a582f26a1f2335872fcb7e2df5bbf51 1392946 debug extra ncftp-dbgsym_3.2.5-2_amd64.deb
4f398903a1d6089b3acefbeb19275a49 284492 net optional ncftp_3.2.5-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=wcOk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: