Accepted racket 6.5-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 10:44:33 -0300
Source: racket
Binary: racket racket-common racket-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 6.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Changed-By: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Description:
racket - extensible programming language in the Scheme family
racket-common - extensible programming language in the Scheme family (shared file
racket-doc - extensible programming language in the Scheme family (documentati
Closes: 783434 814866 823182
Changes:
racket (6.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
* Bug fix: "Recommends libpng12 which is going away, please switch to
libpng16", thanks to Mattia Rizzolo (Closes: #823182).
* update drracket.desktop, remove menu files
* remove transitional plt-* packages.
* drop recommends on libjpeg8, thanks to Adam Borowski (Closes: #814866).
* Bug fix: "Local documentation links to remote instead of local",
thanks to Diogo Ramos (Closes: #783434).
* All patches now upstream.
Checksums-Sha1:
9eaaccdd938f5cfa17eb6bbdeafbf6fda4f3bf89 2002 racket_6.5-1.dsc
d8390e91813de13e59ef56e857fb8a52cc92b2f8 20915932 racket_6.5.orig.tar.gz
633f0488c38bfc7083164378f510a9ae44624181 23644 racket_6.5-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
ac3430810c32de8fe76c40ec1a136f2af09c3f22c540b08a1264d6721a5267a9 2002 racket_6.5-1.dsc
2925d35af4eb040b20c6c7e2b62d5c7a262541c1eaa189ef0baf1e344b3c703f 20915932 racket_6.5.orig.tar.gz
49c662d0482f2f7c4bd9702775722355ed5ca76aadb94f6eadba9fc5f7eb7efd 23644 racket_6.5-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
8d8ea8be8a4231fbe9afe63a7db8fbe4 2002 lisp optional racket_6.5-1.dsc
a99ac851495e15de5415763d77077a60 20915932 lisp optional racket_6.5.orig.tar.gz
42343032e433972976c23c4fbbecda15 23644 lisp optional racket_6.5-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=58A+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: