Accepted sendmail 8.15.2-4 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:02:10 +0100
Source: sendmail
Binary: sendmail-bin rmail sensible-mda libmilter1.0.1 libmilter1.0.1-dbg libmilter-dev sendmail-doc sendmail sendmail-base sendmail-cf
Architecture: source
Version: 8.15.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
Description:
libmilter-dev - Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter) (development files)
libmilter1.0.1 - Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter)
libmilter1.0.1-dbg - Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter) (debug symbols)
rmail - MTA->UUCP remote mail handler
sendmail - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent (metapacka
sendmail-base - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent (arch inde
sendmail-bin - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent
sendmail-cf - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent (config ma
sendmail-doc - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent (documenta
sensible-mda - Mail Delivery Agent wrapper
Closes: 816505
Changes:
sendmail (8.15.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* Reinstate SOCKETMAP support (and some more compile time settings that were
lost on the 8.14 -> 8.15 switch). (Closes: #816505)
* Update Vcs-Git URL.
* Update to Standards-Version: 3.9.7.
Checksums-Sha1:
8c35ad11e790142fbe40878dc615c2e76d874c1e 2601 sendmail_8.15.2-4.dsc
19957b8710116a388e76e04a8c414d0ac4e7f8b1 404368 sendmail_8.15.2-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
659c8a13400809b949596f6ca360c1517d7e65c72b425b26d42946a1a70329d8 2601 sendmail_8.15.2-4.dsc
9a5952f9ff582300ddf328c8526f29b95f982ee4a8e4811cfa8d395a2e39590f 404368 sendmail_8.15.2-4.debian.tar.xz
Files:
caebc63bede96772c606241f630fae4c 2601 mail extra sendmail_8.15.2-4.dsc
317c537134c1202bafdc3aab03d11b39 404368 mail extra sendmail_8.15.2-4.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=hDsO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: