[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ruby-netcdf 0.7.1.1-7 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:02:08 +0900
Source: ruby-netcdf
Binary: ruby-netcdf
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.7.1.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
Description:
 ruby-netcdf - Ruby interface of netCDF library
Changes:
 ruby-netcdf (0.7.1.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Remove dbg package
   * Add patch: fix spelling error
   * Fix lintian warning: vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri
   * Rebuild against Ruby 2.3
   * Bump Standard Version: 3.9.7
Checksums-Sha1:
 3043358f1a2870b42634353f7b3fa5c32ccbb1f9 2054 ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7.dsc
 265c674492e58b762f286a07422ff73a7a960bd3 29936 ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7.debian.tar.xz
 66ab7a18866e839d4c541afa4f7efbff448db6d8 165858 ruby-netcdf-dbgsym_0.7.1.1-7_amd64.deb
 97150a47022193cb59ca03b9c7ab0a3ead3478ad 53720 ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 d309517f3ea677e0bd0b6d926a877c298446b309e714b25302fe8d175418ecdd 2054 ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7.dsc
 621f98c1fefddfff64037cd20fba8ac54a0bd93cd2027954046ec2ef250ac342 29936 ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7.debian.tar.xz
 217393af1e41a461576d212b2921c53c0b41c6b979db47d806461d98310a5a70 165858 ruby-netcdf-dbgsym_0.7.1.1-7_amd64.deb
 5262b3bb3af9370fea1713ee857d2e0712b0461efd07707d9099803ab6123a99 53720 ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7_amd64.deb
Files:
 108a90faf2868d451248b99b80c6e176 2054 ruby optional ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7.dsc
 760c555a121da4dc49200ac47e2d7009 29936 ruby optional ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7.debian.tar.xz
 679285969aa5b571f3cb9b409d04c995 165858 debug extra ruby-netcdf-dbgsym_0.7.1.1-7_amd64.deb
 ca537f2e5db37e8580d5f57416cba9cc 53720 ruby optional ruby-netcdf_0.7.1.1-7_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=qvYJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: