[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.5 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:38:51 +0200
Source: blktap-dkms
Binary: blktap-dkms
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.93-0.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Chrysostomos Nanakos <cnanakos@debian.org>
Description:
 blktap-dkms - Xen API blktap kernel component DKMS package
Changes:
 blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.5) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * All occurences of mempools based on slab caches with object
     constructors have been removed from the kernel tree. Initialize
     blktap request on mempool allocation instead.
Checksums-Sha1:
 39e0c4b3dc81329397626302f4e7b94bf75cb3d9 1975 blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.5.dsc
 27c936ab378a098fcaeb134924e69d7e78b06210 21971 blktap-dkms_2.0.93.orig.tar.gz
 729399c2270876290e456d2f0894a882a205f2e4 5692 blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 2b942f1d2b7f58945e5401c9093cdda8928fdaf73377cba4b63bc16f0bad0b34 1975 blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.5.dsc
 7211a14bda91b69667b98bda2a3faaed3e4a22b79f1b47b88307374927fa1ab6 21971 blktap-dkms_2.0.93.orig.tar.gz
 6688b2ed426195070143b5b4bee5756919cf7b9646a564f64ba631a84e032027 5692 blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 d64c6fed1115ea60f499eb747c918262 1975 kernel optional blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.5.dsc
 3f44cc47caf09485497e28405b94aa02 21971 kernel optional blktap-dkms_2.0.93.orig.tar.gz
 cce0209575dd2aa2f487cbfcf28e8707 5692 kernel optional blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=MlQp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: