Accepted clblas 2.8+ds1-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 09:52:36 +0000
Source: clblas
Binary: libclblas-bin libclblas-dev libclblas-doc libclblas2 libclblas2-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 2.8+ds1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ghislain Antony Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>
Description:
libclblas-bin - OpenCL BLAS library (executables)
libclblas-dev - OpenCL BLAS library (development files)
libclblas-doc - OpenCL BLAS library (documentation)
libclblas2 - OpenCL BLAS library (shared library)
libclblas2-dbg - OpenCL BLAS library (debugging symbols)
Closes: 805893
Changes:
clblas (2.8+ds1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add missing maintainer CXXFLAGS.
Thanks to YunQian Su for the suggestion.
* Install examples to doc package.
* Add autopkgtest testsuite.
* Add -mxgot option to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS for mips64* build.
Thanks to YunQian Su for the fix. (Closes: #805893)
* Remove unnecessary CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE override.
Checksums-Sha1:
41b5fcd34979f0768f13c10c80a3c691faf8b0c8 2326 clblas_2.8+ds1-2.dsc
0a0afd52d0d95d94c7d49c31b73fe7092f99af80 7868 clblas_2.8+ds1-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
7d013b9c8783ae7785112988c219294cacbba76238aaea799e01a4840177def7 2326 clblas_2.8+ds1-2.dsc
a4eeb30703d7b123e39f41645b94177550a7ffefef671cc2d3e4a38b68951522 7868 clblas_2.8+ds1-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
16e785e4b63199f204a616f0a9125627 2326 science optional clblas_2.8+ds1-2.dsc
398aeb54b344e878af33738d673f0f03 7868 science optional clblas_2.8+ds1-2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=VK0p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: