Accepted glx-alternatives 0.6.1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:43:25 +0200
Source: glx-alternatives
Binary: glx-diversions glx-alternative-mesa glx-alternative-nvidia glx-alternative-fglrx
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian NVIDIA Maintainers <pkg-nvidia-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
Description:
glx-alternative-fglrx - allows the selection of FGLRX as GLX provider
glx-alternative-mesa - allows the selection of MESA as GLX provider
glx-alternative-nvidia - allows the selection of NVIDIA as GLX provider
glx-diversions - prepare for using accelerated GLX implementations from GPU vendor
Closes: 795262 799948
Changes:
glx-alternatives (0.6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* glx-alternative-nvidia: Enable the alternative for headless CUDA setups,
too, which primarily need the nouveau blacklist. (Closes: #795262)
* Temporarily disable the nvidia-drm-outputclass.conf slave alternative.
(Closes: #799948)
* Use devref's 'pathfind' instead of 'test -x /ab/solute/path'.
Checksums-Sha1:
e38c4f8148890f81ef2b2c6a5531576f96c3a510 1995 glx-alternatives_0.6.1.dsc
1955ff32e975e7f94a58264fd909aa013ba6f69b 10640 glx-alternatives_0.6.1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
993ff7614ad46bf6b2934c59760547e714d7784ba3128e1914bfecf05f7bf36a 1995 glx-alternatives_0.6.1.dsc
419b629178322754b885731ed0f4b8ff6f160707ae27837a40849191aab6eca3 10640 glx-alternatives_0.6.1.tar.xz
Files:
dd74e4be878b99bdb186eb34892ed717 1995 contrib/libs optional glx-alternatives_0.6.1.dsc
a2b072027458491eda2f0eba06461f21 10640 contrib/libs optional glx-alternatives_0.6.1.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=j6Br
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: