Accepted node-requires-port 0.0.1-1 (source all) into unstable, unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 19:36:04 +0200
Source: node-requires-port
Binary: node-requires-port
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de>
Description:
node-requires-port - checks if a protocol requires a certain port number to be added t
Changes:
node-requires-port (0.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release
Checksums-Sha1:
f526ccd52d85471a4d9079c5260a6395792f3b09 2207 node-requires-port_0.0.1-1.dsc
4b4414411d9df7c855995dd899a8c78a2951c16d 3138 node-requires-port_0.0.1.orig.tar.gz
4805a47b7ebf0856a4a34092e4fba1a555e0d86a 2068 node-requires-port_0.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
eb41f44cd02446827cb6af3aa084962ddb8c431e 3678 node-requires-port_0.0.1-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
f84949b11bae70a354a6d325ff17fb0f1f1a8d9e0d8c6ec31f100f9bde9caaf1 2207 node-requires-port_0.0.1-1.dsc
dc10406729eceef4a1b6e85af963b348358a27af596f177f707f0089e916b97d 3138 node-requires-port_0.0.1.orig.tar.gz
876b29944b04e463439857b2faeeabb119cedd30c8e79341e1c9aedcf59ba194 2068 node-requires-port_0.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
b97f7f0f50e2a4e3f6eb4d31ff90ce647b923e02f67e5e872d04f3c14c51c16d 3678 node-requires-port_0.0.1-1_all.deb
Files:
b04b0b58affde620b018d4e71c78c576 2207 web extra node-requires-port_0.0.1-1.dsc
abbdc4c101ac74fafe2c42c0d0a25c61 3138 web extra node-requires-port_0.0.1.orig.tar.gz
6b63c186cba931cb7bb7f3794f12b2f1 2068 web extra node-requires-port_0.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
5fd633550b06151f0ad3c56933aabb94 3678 web extra node-requires-port_0.0.1-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJV5eZcXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2MjAxRkJGRkRCQkRFMDc4MjJFQUJCOTY5
NkZDQUMwRDM4N0I1ODQ3AAoJEJb8rA04e1hH0pYP/A5Q99ASPk4jRLP6E+cr1rdy
T9cwRux02oaP1zcp2pferJV7MJYwFA0zouj0Jt556Fob9+RGyXRcWLlYXisNTMct
YXZ6BNWHz6jDDv1rGlllVvtqzzSo5EI5iHM1v+wjYXPwFGeQ33acQQmvX027yFvy
o929KOmMffYDLhXmkKGC4yNh1cnOvTY7EOTsNjn4OBl+HbnL6dRtnf2MMT7hZvVn
raa6OLwweqB5xkBlbaupOL4dndR6fXIZVNb/b24kMqLBE4/tUwPNWOthFgXL15eF
TjV34qNuRSkawuCp/yrWUUUEMDyupYr+xe5rtlqAWwX1/aen7G28T7cXRl32aWFv
FAc1Oy28TaEPDmI8AthhSGquAeqSxcMUjmAZxiz7+gp8VUS+QYB1sxaZ/WZ38uav
3q9L1E8RQZTPYMT4jyEvGxslFK8/otDSI4GfI+HNzoLzkLwi/ZeMB4TJqpFunGoe
2uErFuNr4cHxO74PMxiMEhsG50K/mrdzT4BoIdtUI1QD4NbW/N+XiJirz+td4/UX
mnokQqm7VKtlC+1sx6QiFRWrUgnZgM6yiS5fUhoidbQVNBFNEN9GT3PetXCq+MWY
RonAdgLYcuCIuYyzkt/ZIwcRu4qGjuFMVUTebEE+AiovIejIzD8Y3wWMJYxFgtIM
x33e4Ww1ab0Nd1oJcSaf
=I5WK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: