[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted luckybackup 0.4.8-2 (source all amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 19:16:28 +0200
Source: luckybackup
Binary: luckybackup luckybackup-data
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.4.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Changed-By: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Description:
 luckybackup - rsync-based GUI data backup utility
 luckybackup-data - rsync-based GUI data backup utility (data files)
Changes:
 luckybackup (0.4.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed).
   * Update to DEP5 debian/copyright format.
   * Drop deprecated hardening-wrapper.
Checksums-Sha1:
 579787645fdb9c8132aca42ee6b89001d5c55067 1810 luckybackup_0.4.8-2.dsc
 83e997982e95f0c272f9e9c086968c6fe2e56f9e 3676 luckybackup_0.4.8-2.debian.tar.xz
 b6831918fb8b3cb080b038a9ed57812781d5ca9e 4366834 luckybackup-data_0.4.8-2_all.deb
 167db5b6dde0caa952112011177798972c63545e 587160 luckybackup_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 6befd396a1d49819254942f5ff045e108511c1c9e628deafb950f27e1e5b5360 1810 luckybackup_0.4.8-2.dsc
 cac005494a8c55bbe5be31e1537c573a81fb31fdbfe355182b1ca301e87853af 3676 luckybackup_0.4.8-2.debian.tar.xz
 24f61483cbf03731b7f4b33b328dbc379e1d9bc382110ca2691d8612ec6f9b66 4366834 luckybackup-data_0.4.8-2_all.deb
 7573ab124b3001c8db50c3025d06fb587cfdd23949ca564a7d87d49acb6befd8 587160 luckybackup_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb
Files:
 bcf5d67e1be4296dc9d0448d8caf5100 1810 utils optional luckybackup_0.4.8-2.dsc
 5f5b64298bce7396b36bf7ebfc1ccc35 3676 utils optional luckybackup_0.4.8-2.debian.tar.xz
 556d93d5c8ef694f003f351211018ece 4366834 utils optional luckybackup-data_0.4.8-2_all.deb
 177452da5aedb71a30f14e635b408f7f 587160 utils optional luckybackup_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=2S50
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: