Accepted pax-utils 1.0.1-1 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:42:52 +0100
Source: pax-utils
Binary: pax-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Tomasz Buchert <tomasz@debian.org>
Changed-By: Tomasz Buchert <tomasz@debian.org>
Description:
pax-utils - Security-focused ELF files checking tool
Closes: 776715
Changes:
pax-utils (1.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix reproducibility problem (Closes: #776715)
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes required)
* Correct lintian warnings
* Skip the tests (temporary workaround)
* Imported Upstream version 1.0.1
Checksums-Sha1:
9d8b2e4506272895f201a38eb61efd322fef9f57 1874 pax-utils_1.0.1-1.dsc
aefd3e4a7c056d57f3dfdc3ec270a24d68f334f8 619788 pax-utils_1.0.1.orig.tar.xz
2110253826935d6293288dc5d0c79d04bd8e47f4 3152 pax-utils_1.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
29c252adc93d85d4f1416f37977bf2b3b66a46cf 71576 pax-utils_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
2b0e31fed699379af5e79c82bb3bf0b26b5502c6d58353eca6db22c7930c3ea3 1874 pax-utils_1.0.1-1.dsc
87654ec8c207ab35fc05e96ec89b196cf7ab765e0e7919015ccaa7f0e66e246c 619788 pax-utils_1.0.1.orig.tar.xz
ed422b7ecdd8da86bf4bd5921933378f0efc21075b5e7b7fc3b7728db92fd135 3152 pax-utils_1.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
cf44f77da2bcaa6cd22784b47f6cf4711eafc1eafcfbea392f0f56419210a4f3 71576 pax-utils_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb
Files:
4954b457b37d89fc80c146a2368f7a63 1874 misc extra pax-utils_1.0.1-1.dsc
16197166fc148342b277224d8c49a1fa 619788 misc extra pax-utils_1.0.1.orig.tar.xz
d1da79b11b6fae7ec532cb68fb6e791f 3152 misc extra pax-utils_1.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
416dace4a348ec2c44f7bd3d478bfe32 71576 misc extra pax-utils_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=66/J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: