Accepted cpio 2.11+dfsg-4.1 (source all amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:44:25 +0100
Source: cpio
Binary: cpio cpio-win32
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.11+dfsg-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
Changed-By: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>
Description:
cpio - GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of files
cpio-win32 - GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of files (win32 build)
Closes: 774669
Changes:
cpio (2.11+dfsg-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Apply patch by Vitezslav Cizek of SuSE to fix CVE-2015-1197.
Upstream is dormant or no longer existing. To restore the old
behaviour use --extract-over-symlinks (Closes: #774669)
This issue has been discovered by Alexander Cherepanov.
Checksums-Sha1:
b527b273defef077630777c06d25bb1c9b8c8f4d 1849 cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1.dsc
6c0dd7b033bc9f4e22918ff329558572f8c30a58 19076 cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1.debian.tar.xz
948decc4171afb2878689f44321fefc4d6a40b83 59652 cpio-win32_2.11+dfsg-4.1_all.deb
e8f80f6d1398c74c24370dd62a6cd0790380509e 176328 cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
7b50bd8b97c4485518bd4439e9ccdc04776c6875700274cfd31673a7a3d75347 1849 cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1.dsc
12018c408e4b42c437b11cf77828d8ecfb381c6862349567abc26a1da165dd54 19076 cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1.debian.tar.xz
b4b09cad9df06d8b4783d8d44f335e68cc4ff9a5898ace42e7f9986d119f9bbf 59652 cpio-win32_2.11+dfsg-4.1_all.deb
bb711cb6818d14cd5e140eaec6f2ab9cfb2d6d63fa3bcd9a95eba4e0fb92522d 176328 cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1_amd64.deb
Files:
7c649f4a8a4502b2f57484bf3bd70d2e 1849 utils important cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1.dsc
04a8fe34d792c08d590e2ff03199be87 19076 utils important cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1.debian.tar.xz
5575bbe4447c3c0bae8553e072445602 59652 utils extra cpio-win32_2.11+dfsg-4.1_all.deb
909a9f456884acfec7349c64ac0168c2 176328 utils important cpio_2.11+dfsg-4.1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=xcnc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: