Accepted ruby-pygments.rb 0.5.4~ds1-2 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:43:57 -0200
Source: ruby-pygments.rb
Binary: ruby-pygments.rb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.4~ds1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Description:
ruby-pygments.rb - pygments wrapper for Ruby
Closes: 775631
Changes:
ruby-pygments.rb (0.5.4~ds1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload
* fix tests (Closes: #775631):
- test_highlight_works_with_larger_files: instead of testing for an exact
amount of bytes, pass with there are more than 400,000 of them.
(debian/patches/0007-Update-test-result.patch)
- test_highlight_works_with_single_character_input: removed, since the
underlying Python code does not support that use case.
(debian/patches/0008-Drop-unfeasible-test.patch)
Checksums-Sha1:
4a00523c5378bf9ddad4c7a654b29d915f7b03d5 2149 ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2.dsc
5969b449985337b5be8500126f66ada36fcd1478 7104 ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2.debian.tar.xz
54e0b1b14a0bcb4c241bcafddd192fd28a8f6f60 278284 ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ba1ae96029e7fc2884f438bb417ba9f3fe1b29da44e119397e5e81defc2e1817 2149 ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2.dsc
8ae5eb7ff5c89d53952440ba62176ede3123d194163266cf4eaff7b416e04823 7104 ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2.debian.tar.xz
9b205935ce76d485dc7b40eb511972ea09bee2cf01235c4ab75c17169929e48b 278284 ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2_all.deb
Files:
9135c268653c2d9f833f8dee6d9d8876 2149 ruby optional ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2.dsc
929f9d87117beccc7bfdf1a951e0a4e9 7104 ruby optional ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2.debian.tar.xz
58b34e63d8eb3286f7e31ae5548057d3 278284 ruby optional ruby-pygments.rb_0.5.4~ds1-2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=g8pI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: