[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted privoxy 3.0.21-5 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:44:23 +0100
Source: privoxy
Binary: privoxy
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.21-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Rosenfeld <roland@debian.org>
Changed-By: Roland Rosenfeld <roland@debian.org>
Description:
 privoxy    - Privacy enhancing HTTP Proxy
Closes: 775167
Changes:
 privoxy (3.0.21-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * 34_CVE-2015-1030: Fix memory leak in rfc2553_connect_to().  CID 66382
   * 35_CVE-2015-1031-CID66394: unmap(): Prevent use-after-free if the map
     only consists of one item.  CID 66394.
   * 36_CVE-2015-1031-CID66376: pcrs_execute(): Consistently set *result to
     NULL in case of errors.  Should make use-after-free in the caller less
     likely.  CID 66391, CID 66376.
   * These 3 patches Closes: #775167.
Checksums-Sha1:
 e6de1fb4dae35b1765d0fac21245533af1f72338 1841 privoxy_3.0.21-5.dsc
 bf3a257c75fa653a9a1f5c18bd40ab1ad9532f6b 18864 privoxy_3.0.21-5.debian.tar.xz
 7e56e47a8a3ad648066071fd56d491e9410dc189 493654 privoxy_3.0.21-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 251dc957fe855ead7ce80390d8318e0bf914c051e51fdbd26023e9c34175ca6e 1841 privoxy_3.0.21-5.dsc
 ce5275e0b99103b88435c2f072b6fa7ff005ad6f2297339580e42c3c1d56286a 18864 privoxy_3.0.21-5.debian.tar.xz
 d52861ea26d591e38811fe894da679bbb703ba0838c7a34a75d89a3a4f5fe882 493654 privoxy_3.0.21-5_amd64.deb
Files:
 f99d22c2f2c4fa8ef232c156f6ce0591 1841 web optional privoxy_3.0.21-5.dsc
 35dba6d4a63f69aab569d94e2d1005e5 18864 web optional privoxy_3.0.21-5.debian.tar.xz
 9c20250c5b6c96c3976b1e9c214d07c7 493654 web optional privoxy_3.0.21-5_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=Dx9z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: