Accepted x52pro 0.1.1-2.2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:12:21 +0100
Source: x52pro
Binary: libx52pro-dev libx52pro0
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.1-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Grzegorz Kolorz <gkolorz@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
Description:
libx52pro-dev - MFD and LED library for Saitek X52pro joysticks - dev files (dumm
libx52pro0 - MFD and LED library for Saitek x52pro joysticks (dummy)
Closes: 708274 734067 767675 773147
Changes:
x52pro (0.1.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Update udev rules, thanks to Alex Volkov. (Closes: #734067)
* Turn libx52pro-dev and libx52pro0 into empty dummy packages to ensure
smooth upgrades from wheezy. The wheezy packages used 'udevadm trigger' in
a no longer supported way that prevented removal of the packages after an
distupgrade to jessie. (Closes: #767675, #773147, #708274)
* The package content may be reinstated after the jessie release.
Checksums-Sha1:
1b767c1ea5ed7e6b836bef365be0355376c033f9 1766 x52pro_0.1.1-2.2.dsc
7210c71999e05b47d485c70d4e5316848f7c2f9a 3336 x52pro_0.1.1-2.2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
a5e2f6a2e32974b3387bc8cf4bd9ea33fc65466541e71f1822007270f9d8b0d6 1766 x52pro_0.1.1-2.2.dsc
3fde6c2c3113cab245f4f46ae96684b3663ddb4ce39dca7e127ab03ed5366ea2 3336 x52pro_0.1.1-2.2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
9864dfae6e5aa4e351089b9afb935068 1766 libs extra x52pro_0.1.1-2.2.dsc
b61c238c84726dedabb12e7d22c77f5f 3336 libs extra x52pro_0.1.1-2.2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=BTzQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: