Accepted mod-proxy-msrpc 0.5-2 (source amd64) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 22:48:39 +0100
Source: mod-proxy-msrpc
Binary: libapache2-mod-proxy-msrpc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Micha Lenk <micha@debian.org>
Changed-By: Micha Lenk <micha@debian.org>
Description:
libapache2-mod-proxy-msrpc - Apache module for Outlook Anywhere support in reverse proxy setup
Closes: 774285
Changes:
mod-proxy-msrpc (0.5-2) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Upload to experimental because I don't know whether this change will
get a freeze exception for Debian Jessie.
* Add patch upstream-big-endian-patch.diff to fix build on big endian
architectures (closes: #774285). This essentially updates the source to
upstream Git commit 03ed564ee88b1a35e830c4f141e178125010c265 (all changes
since the release 0.5 were only related to big-endian support).
* Package is compliant to Debian Policy 3.9.6 (no changes needed).
Checksums-Sha1:
1da0e5d44f28a1bf7dc4fff4b393a3ae1191090f 1987 mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2.dsc
57d39c5d2c7baf906969eeb13ffab8afdf2ec342 5660 mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2.debian.tar.xz
e71ee9381cf92e95ff6602b862ff4508f49f1c02 25646 libapache2-mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
a335e09399f757671241266a8043c6e48197377c2814b6ba092d60fff80b0e22 1987 mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2.dsc
fb403b14edf8c2137998e34682cbf04dd544d51a58799b194b587dc29e8e3149 5660 mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2.debian.tar.xz
257963edda453d84ef2f4892ba3f90eb54cc379015abc20ebd32b3792b9df5a9 25646 libapache2-mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2_amd64.deb
Files:
69252d80d3ed8b998f853c26ce70b073 1987 httpd extra mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2.dsc
773554c0e6d879939ff8d951b46fbca6 5660 httpd extra mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2.debian.tar.xz
0c30e52417115bac23b9870e54b70973 25646 httpd extra libapache2-mod-proxy-msrpc_0.5-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=2GvA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: