Accepted wmbiff 0.4.27-2.3 (source i386) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 08:04:00 +0100
Source: wmbiff
Binary: wmbiff
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.27-2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Neil Spring <nspring@cs.washington.edu>
Changed-By: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@debian.org>
Description:
wmbiff - A dockable app that displays information about mailboxes
Closes: 759259
Changes:
wmbiff (0.4.27-2.3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* 20_gnutls_set_default_priority.diff: Use gnutls_set_default_priority()
to get GnuTLS upstream's recommended default values (SSL/TLS versions,
ciphers, et al.) instead of setting local defaults using the deprecated
gnutls_cipher_set_priority/gnutls_protocol_set_priority/... functions.
This fixes transmission errors to modern systems. Closes: #759259
(Thanks to Nye Liu for debugging the issue and finding the solution.)
Checksums-Sha1:
d34c2a2c92088818219ca1dcc128a0fc66078ace 1791 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3.dsc
9c86d7b3300d08fe3624a937ea2c45b682687a7d 64328 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3.debian.tar.xz
8177289497231802fcc8c2aafdae7e0e5a5e1ef2 95098 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
cc3ea34d6f278e1bb3e48f67acf63bb0b50d0995496df3a98819159181565b58 1791 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3.dsc
4fdc06ad7aa7bed3c13edf3941675d883532e6d94ae17316a7e8a5f81213c346 64328 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3.debian.tar.xz
0fa544950e9b38b882288881e76549130b615a6e147a1ff2a6fa35008a2270ef 95098 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3_i386.deb
Files:
9bbe07f96daf826832ea0b7b401a0ca5 1791 x11 optional wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3.dsc
a565c3e486efd3d377c130819de296f7 64328 x11 optional wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3.debian.tar.xz
7af1bcd9de4e01e863e93080a23a298c 95098 x11 optional wmbiff_0.4.27-2.3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=BY9q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: