Accepted apt-cacher-ng 0.8.0~rc4-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 00:01:06 +0200
Source: apt-cacher-ng
Binary: apt-cacher-ng
Architecture: source
Version: 0.8.0~rc4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
Changed-By: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
Description:
apt-cacher-ng - caching proxy server for software repositories
Closes: 737069 763685 765963
Changes:
apt-cacher-ng (0.8.0~rc4-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version
+ fixes missing EOF chunk for some generated responses (closes: 765963)
+ deep review and fixing of extra file download code acting in
repository space without backend specification (closes: #737069)
+ fixes FTBFS for non-Linux targets (closes: #763685), and debian/rules
now detects the usage of sd_notify by looking at build system state
Checksums-Sha1:
16e9f3f5f8c728c450a3f11c9314adf69e06fb01 1972 apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4-1.dsc
ac3da99c91d979d6a727af4735f86e00faf5eb08 278700 apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4.orig.tar.xz
0b44ac07c03161fa516bf96382c924bc26e802ea 40444 apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
cbe23311056bc6fcf27f7a94984b493d441020a25e642053c0ea979005cb3f01 1972 apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4-1.dsc
c8577ff89c28b9dd3aae4feae829a6ceb4957f60f17dd5e23dc1c046dbb6e11f 278700 apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4.orig.tar.xz
6dac5db3179ab6d309ce970cd35f7a92892b3be98f302ab440b9b4b8cb6a4a2c 40444 apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
fb88fb8a92f4b36a2c747675422fb9f7 1972 net optional apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4-1.dsc
72b802f105bfe283b257a7b4f9dd0fc7 278700 net optional apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4.orig.tar.xz
c76b81fab5867ab54f1339f2be48a210 40444 net optional apt-cacher-ng_0.8.0~rc4-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=9YXJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: