Accepted nfs-utils 1:1.2.8-7 (source mips) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 12:25:47 +0100
Source: nfs-utils
Binary: nfs-kernel-server nfs-common
Architecture: source mips
Version: 1:1.2.8-7
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian kernel team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
Description:
nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server
Changes:
nfs-utils (1:1.2.8-7) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Get rid of libgssglue1.
Don't pass "--with-gssglue" to ./configure.
Build-depend on libtirpc-dev (>= 0.2.4-2~).
Depend on libtirpc1 (>= 0.2.4-2~).
Depend on rpcbind (>= 0.2.1-5~).
* Remove debian/source/options.
Checksums-Sha1:
7af9d2c6169d38bfd8224e69b802501bcbd288b1 2254 nfs-utils_1.2.8-7.dsc
ea18a0acc29d7cfb5013e5208d4ebbdb89f90e11 40592 nfs-utils_1.2.8-7.debian.tar.xz
b2c77dc57d0a2c609a7e3c3c53d481ee5dd2c2c5 111438 nfs-kernel-server_1.2.8-7_mips.deb
2f2a4e27350736d5a67dd87d9ab268b5966ad9e1 199706 nfs-common_1.2.8-7_mips.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
cdac0698e6dfd4281252c48e75db360fafe620c8742ad1713a7c35c2656a02ba 2254 nfs-utils_1.2.8-7.dsc
33fcb33eb761151eefe5da8be1003a1dc5a9ec80301eaf49fe4672521ff45ebc 40592 nfs-utils_1.2.8-7.debian.tar.xz
4d4d454f3e9766adafeb8577b89d029d534cd5e392f8937f703ff5bc967ac095 111438 nfs-kernel-server_1.2.8-7_mips.deb
a5188927b2c4ee87e1dbe164955225b190b5add405acb6699474a43ca83e0359 199706 nfs-common_1.2.8-7_mips.deb
Files:
463ac3999d61529dfaf6c84d4d87117f 111438 net optional nfs-kernel-server_1.2.8-7_mips.deb
1cad56f4f3584caab297b989520d60c4 199706 net standard nfs-common_1.2.8-7_mips.deb
35f3624552a0ec514450dffd06b08182 2254 net standard nfs-utils_1.2.8-7.dsc
89bcc5545a6f66df8df6e76973060d4a 40592 net standard nfs-utils_1.2.8-7.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=3lBV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: