Accepted gpg-remailer 2.55.01-1 (source amd64)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:10:38 +0200
Source: gpg-remailer
Binary: gpg-remailer
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.55.01-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frank B. Brokken <f.b.brokken@rug.nl>
Changed-By: Frank B. Brokken <f.b.brokken@rug.nl>
Description:
gpg-remailer - Forwards re-encrypted PGP/GPG mail to a group
Changes:
gpg-remailer (2.55.01-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (adds missing but essential -pthread compilation
flag)
* Added -pthread to debian/rules
Checksums-Sha1:
7bacd3e26c2ec75e1cf0d0da2d3d1ac0f767e0df 2095 gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1.dsc
9646eb945380fc64d5a27cf59e657cc445b0a939 40235 gpg-remailer_2.55.01.orig.tar.gz
aa475ce50bfe607066eb40bf05ea6517666e4f59 3341 gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1.debian.tar.gz
a2ad0b3f6ca4c3204e9a35ee76b4c8ef529a3ed8 52180 gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
732dd549b45a15b51ce2a3d0f00a816f2b1b6c2ea6799354771c055c808b0aa1 2095 gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1.dsc
4915ac782efe6612204b0e66ed8fa45d6d3de937585371eb912a489fe99b3a74 40235 gpg-remailer_2.55.01.orig.tar.gz
7108bb88dfb7c404769524d49ebda5c57a778fe8cc90a6d06fe279cd51a1167a 3341 gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1.debian.tar.gz
526af38e17911aeb3b158f4fe259a8e33ce085a9e456b32fcc268e0ee113ce6e 52180 gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1_amd64.deb
Files:
09788338ef84e45847664136015fb958 2095 devel optional gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1.dsc
52dd8897e6edc163be7892439e85e9df 40235 devel optional gpg-remailer_2.55.01.orig.tar.gz
2c6bfc8e214a21ce02735e54d98ee0dc 3341 devel optional gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1.debian.tar.gz
ca2166f40051dd43cb01d8c5d4f8f535 52180 devel optional gpg-remailer_2.55.01-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)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=Yfj1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: