Accepted bitops 1.0-5-1 (source amd64)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 23:06:25 +0900
Source: bitops
Binary: r-cran-bitops
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0-5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
Description:
r-cran-bitops - GNU R package implementing bitwise operations
Changes:
bitops (1.0-5-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* debian/copyright: converted to machine readable format version 1.0.
* debian/control: removed obsolete field DM-Upload-Allow.
* debian/control, debian/compat: using Debhelper 9.
* debian/control: normalised VCS URLs.
* debian/rules: acquire R:Depends directly from r-base-dev.
* Conforms to Policy 3.9.4 (debian/control, no other changes needed).
Checksums-Sha1:
7cfed3564fbcbc59492afba3a4645ae01c2b3f0a 2060 bitops_1.0-5-1.dsc
da6af97da4041f0c98de0bd61deea39c596940b8 8518 bitops_1.0-5.orig.tar.gz
8f973b9ff49156be2270389e7cc19f238923141e 2577 bitops_1.0-5-1.debian.tar.gz
170cf626fe6ac856c2f662b86b0f6306b8f5f2ac 23494 r-cran-bitops_1.0-5-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
3846958e3ec99c42d79a05c0e60ac0cc7d089883f12ca069316d2231cdc91647 2060 bitops_1.0-5-1.dsc
9cb6d83afc272e43ef710fef4bddb930bc12b161ddd98c3e6a75daade5b9d6a0 8518 bitops_1.0-5.orig.tar.gz
759a703360c6c0da2c271e480cedcca4374a978895be02e195113859a40fb910 2577 bitops_1.0-5-1.debian.tar.gz
ca770330a7e45b42bd27612e877535faef215b319a5c22e6bc9243254233db48 23494 r-cran-bitops_1.0-5-1_amd64.deb
Files:
e0a183433d4591a459d8a9f9b176cd77 2060 gnu-r optional bitops_1.0-5-1.dsc
b4474da9bc1725ae0361f2ecb4dbfae2 8518 gnu-r optional bitops_1.0-5.orig.tar.gz
a39cc78cb6a688b5d931d4a3b45cabf0 2577 gnu-r optional bitops_1.0-5-1.debian.tar.gz
58accf59ea2c4807ba5c3027532931e4 23494 gnu-r optional r-cran-bitops_1.0-5-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=eLMZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: