[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted exfat-utils 1.0.1-1 (source amd64)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:24:34 +0100
Source: exfat-utils
Binary: exfat-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Hoexter <hoexter@debian.org>
Changed-By: Sven Hoexter <hoexter@debian.org>
Description: 
 exfat-utils - utilities to create, check, label and dump exFAT filesystem
Changes: 
 exfat-utils (1.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Update all years in debian/copyright.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 24a514c826c92e21e28ed5d89bc3146035f47630 1841 exfat-utils_1.0.1-1.dsc
 993ec885380363f8e7f7fed51b427256c95de9f7 51905 exfat-utils_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 11e285523b6b67b287a19f16fea16888c80fea41 2502 exfat-utils_1.0.1-1.diff.gz
 3e4fd3554acf5783f62251b3b7586c8904cf67ef 90472 exfat-utils_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 1c1799f9ef5828e101f9f5102e9090a706bfe3b704a96ab42af739eb6f189980 1841 exfat-utils_1.0.1-1.dsc
 eeacedca1878065dc3886674ae39cd51149c37bd7d6d7e9325c971a1d1acdab3 51905 exfat-utils_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 b1185422c66ab242f9b1f87ef3432b52cf0ba9c91efe529fd07ad86a842ef9db 2502 exfat-utils_1.0.1-1.diff.gz
 c2424b183317d61c564e1a0f2f49d7b01191a4d50e231e830859f3d3ea5b83cc 90472 exfat-utils_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 80d2b14a2cdf08b2062bb1b83f1f06ea 1841 otherosfs optional exfat-utils_1.0.1-1.dsc
 e592130829d0bf61fa5e3cd1c759d329 51905 otherosfs optional exfat-utils_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 20cfb27fb45e6da15e05181b6a2e30a6 2502 otherosfs optional exfat-utils_1.0.1-1.diff.gz
 0547b9929ed1c94c284ee94c7605690b 90472 otherosfs optional exfat-utils_1.0.1-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=HdQX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: