[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted renameutils 0.10.0-3 (source amd64)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:39:52 +1200
Source: renameutils
Binary: renameutils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.10.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francois Marier <francois@debian.org>
Changed-By: Francois Marier <francois@debian.org>
Description: 
 renameutils - Programs to make file renaming easier
Changes: 
 renameutils (0.10.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Change build-dependency to libreadline-dev instead of libreadline5-dev
     (as per http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html)
   * Bump Standards-Version up to 3.8.3
Checksums-Sha1: 
 5e261a139f03912c7bd188745b994a62deba58e4 1205 renameutils_0.10.0-3.dsc
 c1e094859be95352b06c77c74d437e74fddebdbf 11237 renameutils_0.10.0-3.diff.gz
 c8c2abf996505c1eccca629c949337a1f08908a8 96546 renameutils_0.10.0-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 fd3b07b16ccfaeb85c99e44de8c1af6be3ce657c19bfad7f5cefa2e8b7f7674f 1205 renameutils_0.10.0-3.dsc
 bdc5ab155bc192ab8b490b4eae32e96957cb2dce4296ffa272daa0c32e2b2cbb 11237 renameutils_0.10.0-3.diff.gz
 bae72da5ac8a57a87d0062ed33afa57e0c6f03b8e68d9e2ed9ecfcc44bf01e68 96546 renameutils_0.10.0-3_amd64.deb
Files: 
 4c7362fbef84d0ddca987d289c81d6c3 1205 utils optional renameutils_0.10.0-3.dsc
 87012136fab6fd982c3abdf5ab9b2815 11237 utils optional renameutils_0.10.0-3.diff.gz
 8344da911ce3b75dbb06e2e79fd7fbdf 96546 utils optional renameutils_0.10.0-3_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqtg64ACgkQScUZKBnQNIZpMACfS29Su+5X2drijP5l3c8UByw2
clAAoLUrv4BnAC6+jjzKr/EwSxYI+c/K
=4NHJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
renameutils_0.10.0-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/renameutils/renameutils_0.10.0-3.diff.gz
renameutils_0.10.0-3.dsc
  to pool/main/r/renameutils/renameutils_0.10.0-3.dsc
renameutils_0.10.0-3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/r/renameutils/renameutils_0.10.0-3_amd64.deb


Reply to: