[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pypolicyd-spf 0.5-1 (source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:48:12 -0400
Source: pypolicyd-spf
Binary: python-policyd-spf
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Changed-By: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Description: 
 python-policyd-spf - pure-Python Postfix policy daemon for SPF checking
Changes: 
 pypolicyd-spf (0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Upstream release
   * Remove unnecessary python provides in debian/control
   * Patch out usr/local PYTHONPATH addition (pythonpath.patch)
   * Freshen install-conf-fix.patch
   * Add debian/pycompat
   * Add Python Applications Packaging Team as Uploaders
   * Add Homepage: field to debian/control
   * Add XS-Vcs-Svn: and XS-Vcs-Browser: fields to debian/control
   * Add debian/pyversions and remove XS/XB-Python-Version from debian/control
   * Add debian/rules to install new upstream man page
   * Add man-page-fixup.patch to quiet lintian
   * Simplify debian/rules
Files: 
 02a4e1908f06172e337b9f8c83236b0d 937 mail extra pypolicyd-spf_0.5-1.dsc
 93b93a5e02f87693e38fe0d0152a841d 23289 mail extra pypolicyd-spf_0.5.orig.tar.gz
 0d5db8ff2f42e9cdcb41bc315140fb62 3157 mail extra pypolicyd-spf_0.5-1.diff.gz
 398afb957ec761cf02dace1a9bdedcc1 22236 mail extra python-policyd-spf_0.5-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHBAWyB01zfu119ZkRAj5/AKCtPLuc7svsF9XJk1kw3Sy1wXPWXwCgkb5x
ofMx/nWUzaTtsl/u+0Aw5z4=
=rbMJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
pypolicyd-spf_0.5-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pypolicyd-spf/pypolicyd-spf_0.5-1.diff.gz
pypolicyd-spf_0.5-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pypolicyd-spf/pypolicyd-spf_0.5-1.dsc
pypolicyd-spf_0.5.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pypolicyd-spf/pypolicyd-spf_0.5.orig.tar.gz
python-policyd-spf_0.5-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pypolicyd-spf/python-policyd-spf_0.5-1_all.deb



Reply to: