[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted svgatextmode 1.9-16 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:53:35 +0930
Source: svgatextmode
Binary: svgatextmode
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.9-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ron Lee <ron@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ron Lee <ron@debian.org>
Description: 
 svgatextmode - enable higher resolution text modes
Closes: 387118 394213
Changes: 
 svgatextmode (1.9-16) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Don't use PAGE_SIZE directly, get it from sysconf().  Closes: #394213
   * Switch back to using kbd instead of console-tools, apparently the
     tide has turned on this again.  Closes: #387118
   * Add an LSB blob to the init script.
   * Remove ancient prompts in the postinst about (re)moving obsolete
     config files.  They should all be long gone by now and lintian
     (rightly) bitches about us querying the user directly still.
   * Drop the preinst entirely, it contains only ancient warnings about
     incompatible changes and also tries to interact with the user directly.
     The package dependencies and conffile handling should take care of
     the latest transition well enough by itself, but we can poke people
     from a NEWS file now too, so do that instead.
Files: 
 66a0994562613c366cb58e56fb74a466 582 admin extra svgatextmode_1.9-16.dsc
 694973f74c740877252e00b409582e88 48893 admin extra svgatextmode_1.9-16.diff.gz
 86b9e92d26c2c7d7c74c1cc0c736ded9 351614 admin extra svgatextmode_1.9-16_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGYoWsp4BCHGgCHOQRAjezAJ9Hua9zWcHXtTKH9lTFZX7ziapg8ACdHyH7
t5RiHmyYSEbR0aDM9EKRpLA=
=HMlj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
svgatextmode_1.9-16.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/svgatextmode/svgatextmode_1.9-16.diff.gz
svgatextmode_1.9-16.dsc
  to pool/main/s/svgatextmode/svgatextmode_1.9-16.dsc
svgatextmode_1.9-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/svgatextmode/svgatextmode_1.9-16_i386.deb



Reply to: