[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted nfs-utils 1:1.0.12-2 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  2 Mar 2007 19:54:06 +0100
Source: nfs-utils
Binary: nfs-kernel-server nfs-common
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
Changed-By: Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@debian.org>
Description: 
 nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
 nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server
Closes: 407264 413057
Changes: 
 nfs-utils (1:1.0.12-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Drop 11-root-on-krb5-mounts.patch, as it causes problems with backward
     compatibility. (Closes: #407264, but also probably reopens it at the same
     time...).
   * Add an explicit versioned dependency on libblkid1, since the version in
     sarge lacks the blkid_probe_all_new symbol and the shlibs does not add
     the versioned dependency by itself. (Closes: #413057)
Files: 
 1f68bf2ffa5ad3341e665fd4edfdf7f8 985 net standard nfs-utils_1.0.12-2.dsc
 5012ead68335537080b43fa08e2f0db6 26686 net standard nfs-utils_1.0.12-2.diff.gz
 864ad9751c1ef6aa3d6b057ee47fb276 142828 net optional nfs-kernel-server_1.0.12-2_i386.deb
 6e324883a65448c87b895cfdf1026e2d 131392 net standard nfs-common_1.0.12-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBReh1lH7hqgLJpbVOAQIVsAP/Y8pEIFZEto/eF1lP/bBXvF8DkdaDhqLD
lDkPj8rFY5J6U/1czR6ljFcgm9UEiBxGNUKwdop5bd425Y9RKNFx0N60ms31QMTw
ItbrVbFCH7w6mFe6nXB87Wc4lILR+YLZhfM+T6eVs/WY7noNZLN5D4N/V36MSAkO
v/8y1OFaQkQ=
=p1do
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
nfs-common_1.0.12-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-common_1.0.12-2_i386.deb
nfs-kernel-server_1.0.12-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-kernel-server_1.0.12-2_i386.deb
nfs-utils_1.0.12-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.0.12-2.diff.gz
nfs-utils_1.0.12-2.dsc
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.0.12-2.dsc



Reply to: