[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted guichan 0.4.0-4.1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  1 Nov 2006 11:31:52 +0100
Source: guichan
Binary: libguichan0 libguichan0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.0-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: FERREIRA Yohann <bertram@cegetel.net>
Changed-By: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <sam+deb@zoy.org>
Description: 
 libguichan0 - small, efficient C++ GUI library
 libguichan0-dev - development files for Guichan
Closes: 356133 361405 379099
Changes: 
 guichan (0.4.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/control:
     + Fix short descriptions.
     + Depend and build-depend on liballegro4.2-dev instead of liballegro-dev
       (Closes: #379099).
     + Depend and build-depend on xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev instead of
       xlibmesa-gl-dev (Closes: #356133).
     + Set policy to 3.7.2.
   * src/guichan.cpp:
     + Fix a GCC 4.2 FTBFS issue (Closes: #361405).
   * debian/rules:
     + Run dh_installdeb otherwise debhelper's maintainer scripts don't get
       installed.
Files: 
 456bb83e790539db52feb0dc0828b1d5 700 libs optional guichan_0.4.0-4.1.dsc
 b0d20167b07feeefa79052a7e2abf653 19183 libs optional guichan_0.4.0-4.1.diff.gz
 614403f326fad0ebc2676d823b726eed 146216 libs optional libguichan0_0.4.0-4.1_i386.deb
 8c4cd018e6991a112cbcfdc7c3718263 568750 libdevel optional libguichan0-dev_0.4.0-4.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFSIR3fPP1rylJn2ERAl0JAJ4mNzjlKHOdCanCDdT7BgRDySjg3gCeMRIj
11vuCeFpgioBy1O2CWICTSE=
=Cgpo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
guichan_0.4.0-4.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/guichan/guichan_0.4.0-4.1.diff.gz
guichan_0.4.0-4.1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/guichan/guichan_0.4.0-4.1.dsc
libguichan0-dev_0.4.0-4.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/guichan/libguichan0-dev_0.4.0-4.1_i386.deb
libguichan0_0.4.0-4.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/guichan/libguichan0_0.4.0-4.1_i386.deb



Reply to: