[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted sdcc 2.5.0-8 (source all i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  1 Sep 2005 15:32:50 +0200
Source: sdcc
Binary: sdcc-ucsim sdcc-doc sdcc-libraries sdcc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.5.0-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Description: 
 sdcc       - Small Device C Compiler
 sdcc-doc   - Small Device C Compiler (documentation)
 sdcc-libraries - Small Device C Compiler (libraries)
 sdcc-ucsim - Micro-controller simulator for SDCC
Closes: 325848
Changes: 
 sdcc (2.5.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The "I hope I won't break everything" release.
   * It's seems the .asm files are useless, at least from some targets
     Let's try to remove them (closes: bug#325848).
Files: 
 200086a17b51009a1917c182dcc22f21 729 electronics optional sdcc_2.5.0-8.dsc
 346e9fa89b91a48106ebbc4c6e61af58 27037 electronics optional sdcc_2.5.0-8.diff.gz
 99d487009611b38a79b8883ca5ba4e8e 1044568 electronics optional sdcc_2.5.0-8_i386.deb
 bc727f3e7ef97c5f3992e9c9ffff3de9 487858 electronics optional sdcc-ucsim_2.5.0-8_i386.deb
 c7e7b6083d4fef30f753f143f0adf5e1 902314 electronics optional sdcc-libraries_2.5.0-8_all.deb
 a4ab3e51bcde41644fe8a239fe5b87cb 212594 doc optional sdcc-doc_2.5.0-8_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDFw0Hw3ao2vG823MRAr7+AJ4xO3cnb2L0QxlgIbFZY+jTPgpxcACeJBh5
HatWuEqLnCO8IfFdO6PuzNA=
=Gzpx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
sdcc-doc_2.5.0-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/sdcc/sdcc-doc_2.5.0-8_all.deb
sdcc-libraries_2.5.0-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/sdcc/sdcc-libraries_2.5.0-8_all.deb
sdcc-ucsim_2.5.0-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sdcc/sdcc-ucsim_2.5.0-8_i386.deb
sdcc_2.5.0-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sdcc/sdcc_2.5.0-8.diff.gz
sdcc_2.5.0-8.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sdcc/sdcc_2.5.0-8.dsc
sdcc_2.5.0-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sdcc/sdcc_2.5.0-8_i386.deb



Reply to: