[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted enigmail 2:0.92-1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:59:59 +0100
Source: enigmail
Binary: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail mozilla-enigmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:0.92-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Sack <asac@debian.org>
Changed-By: Alexander Sack <asac@debian.org>
Description: 
 mozilla-enigmail - Enigmail - GPG support for Mozilla MailNews
 mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail - GPG support for Mozilla Thunderbird
Changes: 
 enigmail (2:0.92-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
    * new upstream release
    * gcc-4.0 transition
    * no control.in patching for default build procedure anymore.
      moved patching from clean target to ./debian/rules update_control
    * updated sdk.mozdev releases to THUNDERBIRD_1_0_6 and
      MOZILLA_RELEASE_1_7_8
    * prepared MOZILLA_RELEASE_1_7_10
Files: 
 fe8d571e5afd266ba302a397a23f77d4 830 mail optional enigmail_0.92-1.dsc
 c79925633b9e01fa6737d75c2e7acb89 2038607 mail optional enigmail_0.92.orig.tar.gz
 a5787c218fe63966e1a346412c0ffc13 16537 mail optional enigmail_0.92-1.diff.gz
 90c2f853993401763c2df7fa6f778bc2 314682 mail optional mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail_0.92-1_i386.deb
 5b07d75a52478d91195e9667f3bb7a7a 307434 mail optional mozilla-enigmail_0.92-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC7hH0v8pLOKgkuT8RAvwWAJ978uD8TSG6/6ehZF6Vc6KXceYQkQCgg717
t9yKoLSMMEJ/Galp4YnQj9g=
=OA8m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
enigmail_0.92-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/enigmail_0.92-1.diff.gz
enigmail_0.92-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/enigmail_0.92-1.dsc
enigmail_0.92.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/enigmail_0.92.orig.tar.gz
mozilla-enigmail_0.92-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/mozilla-enigmail_0.92-1_i386.deb
mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail_0.92-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/enigmail/mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail_0.92-1_i386.deb



Reply to: