[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted flex 2.5.31-32 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  7 Jul 2005 17:22:23 -0500
Source: flex
Binary: flex-doc flex
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.5.31-32
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Description: 
 flex       - A fast lexical analyzer generator.
 flex-doc   - Documentation for flex (a fast lexical analyzer generator)
Closes: 287256 308062 311651
Changes: 
 flex (2.5.31-32) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bug fix: "INTL:vi", thanks to Clytie Siddall          (Closes: #311651).
   * Bug fix: "[l10n] Initial Czech translation of flex debconf messages",
     thanks to Miroslav Kure                               (Closes: #308062).
   * Bug fix: "flex: Some members that should be const aren't", thanks to
     Frank B. Brokken  Some members as defined in FlexLexer.h are
     accessors, and should be defined as `const' members, since not doing
     so causes problems when calling these member functions on a const
     object.                                               (Closes: #287256).
Files: 
 92c3aca8377189b3e4c2a621c0e5c914 646 devel standard flex_2.5.31-32.dsc
 9b6696bda9c3775ef19276e69f52a0a6 194698 devel standard flex_2.5.31-32.diff.gz
 44bfaef5978894b6b08707e444cfe013 141530 doc optional flex-doc_2.5.31-32_all.deb
 17546cc7cfe824e6b2100f17e216946f 259016 devel standard flex_2.5.31-32_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCzbfKIbrau78kQkwRAtnhAJsG2h4JQHKc9WVQOeIbQJOc/kAX7QCbBXq8
CtLBMNMVZbHjNGDZtxNaS3k=
=Amt8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
flex-doc_2.5.31-32_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/flex/flex-doc_2.5.31-32_all.deb
flex_2.5.31-32.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/flex/flex_2.5.31-32.diff.gz
flex_2.5.31-32.dsc
  to pool/main/f/flex/flex_2.5.31-32.dsc
flex_2.5.31-32_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flex/flex_2.5.31-32_i386.deb



Reply to: