[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted netpipe 3.6-2 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  5 Apr 2004 20:26:06 +0000
Source: netpipe
Binary: netpipe-mpich netpipe-tcp netpipe-pvm netpipe-lam
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
Changed-By: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
Description: 
 netpipe-lam - A network performance tool using LAM MPI
 netpipe-mpich - A network performance tool using MPICH MPI
 netpipe-pvm - A network performance tool using PVM
 netpipe-tcp - A network performance tool using the TCP protocol
Closes: 231882
Changes: 
 netpipe (3.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bug fix: "netpipe-tcp: Option -P documented but not known", thanks to
     Stephane Bortzmeyer (Closes: #231882).  Edited manpages and netpipe.c
Files: 
 0e5533cf66556c025adf4de0b260b261 622 net optional netpipe_3.6-2.dsc
 51aa7790136b39dddd6cb2b57054a0f7 8737 net optional netpipe_3.6-2.diff.gz
 4a8cef9f962d6e4b73aa24a528ab458f 87482 net optional netpipe-tcp_3.6-2_i386.deb
 75db48bc6610911aa0215c20b9e8b166 89838 net optional netpipe-lam_3.6-2_i386.deb
 9ab4b7fa1aa3c78ca3996141067d4b4c 86228 net optional netpipe-mpich_3.6-2_i386.deb
 0df2d34c6821a487e0e361d67af149ba 86262 net optional netpipe-pvm_3.6-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAccD6czG1wFfwRdwRAgyPAKCiQ58YYo+acnQUbw3Mco/5Dol6iACgtoXP
cSktPl+/rsVfiKsrZW9zhVk=
=vuVw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
netpipe-lam_3.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe-lam_3.6-2_i386.deb
netpipe-mpich_3.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe-mpich_3.6-2_i386.deb
netpipe-pvm_3.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe-pvm_3.6-2_i386.deb
netpipe-tcp_3.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe-tcp_3.6-2_i386.deb
netpipe_3.6-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe_3.6-2.diff.gz
netpipe_3.6-2.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe_3.6-2.dsc



Reply to: