[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted libhtml-mason-perl 1:1.25-2 (all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  4 Mar 2004 18:25:46 +0000
Source: libhtml-mason-perl
Binary: libhtml-mason-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:1.25-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Haslam <araqnid@debian.org>
Changed-By: Steve Haslam <araqnid@debian.org>
Description: 
 libhtml-mason-perl - HTML::Mason Perl module
Closes: 68597 231475
Changes: 
 libhtml-mason-perl (1:1.25-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Move speedy-cgi-perl to Suggests
   * Looks like someone upstream rewrote the example httpd.conf (Closes: #231475)
   * Create /var/lib/mason as a directory owned by www-data.
   * Create /etc/apache/mason as a symlink to /var/lib/mason. So now the
     default MasonDataDir setting should work out-of-the-box.
   * Update my examples to include show-cookies (which can get cookies from
     CGI or Apache::Request), and to allow use of show-headers under pure
     CGI (which now works, due to use of FakeApache.pm)
   * Now automagically install examples for the user to peruse on the local
     Apache. Ask for permission first via debconf. (Closes: #68597)
Files: 
 635ceea52bc053aad94cb612968637af 815 perl optional libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2.dsc
 23e964cd8e150d48f1e6499fce27520e 19320 perl optional libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2.diff.gz
 8e842312f1a068bf56ec13c1d9b361cb 456662 perl optional libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAR3UHjxa1M6+Z1DoRAusHAJ9Vp1PM5eklbQeVk07OuhapixvwcACeKl4p
gdhKrPvTl3Voak+sWKpdh6Y=
=qKjh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libh/libhtml-mason-perl/libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2.diff.gz
libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2.dsc
  to pool/main/libh/libhtml-mason-perl/libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2.dsc
libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/libh/libhtml-mason-perl/libhtml-mason-perl_1.25-2_all.deb



Reply to: