[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted vte 1:0.11.10-4 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:48:39 +0100
Source: vte
Binary: python-vte libvte4 libvte-common libvte-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.11.10-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Marillat <marillat@debian.org>
Description: 
 libvte-common - Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 2.0 - common files
 libvte-dev - Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 2.0 - development files
 libvte4    - Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 2.0 - runtime files
 python-vte - Python bindings for the VTE widget set
Changes: 
 vte (1:0.11.10-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * This package suck more and more, slow, broken and upstream don't care,
     thus orpahned.
Files: 
 e1453a5ce6d43ad8c6e262ae8879dc8a 702 libs optional vte_0.11.10-4.dsc
 7e949cf066873454aecb6cbb134e0203 4975 libs optional vte_0.11.10-4.diff.gz
 b3cfe424f31392dc985f418d251dd056 77800 libs optional libvte-common_0.11.10-4_all.deb
 3169b74b693c50ebd1e46f4fc0216193 651234 libs optional libvte4_0.11.10-4_i386.deb
 b642a2cdf7fb4d171a7f1b48ff278e04 416356 libdevel optional libvte-dev_0.11.10-4_i386.deb
 9cbb343de133f523cd713912e3d07533 327304 python optional python-vte_0.11.10-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAPl00B9xWPR9BuQcRAh7yAJ0eG/h8fgY83GDuWiLmsG6PJpINLQCcCu4E
jLHIr8sm7Pzkmlzrb/UDHe4=
=9IeR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libvte-common_0.11.10-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/libvte-common_0.11.10-4_all.deb
libvte-dev_0.11.10-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/libvte-dev_0.11.10-4_i386.deb
libvte4_0.11.10-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/libvte4_0.11.10-4_i386.deb
python-vte_0.11.10-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vte/python-vte_0.11.10-4_i386.deb
vte_0.11.10-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/vte/vte_0.11.10-4.diff.gz
vte_0.11.10-4.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vte/vte_0.11.10-4.dsc



Reply to: