[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted sane-backends 1.0.12-5 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  2 Jul 2003 12:04:59 +0200
Source: sane-backends
Binary: libsane-dev sane-utils libsane
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.12-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
Description: 
 libsane    - API library for scanners
 libsane-dev - API development library for scanners [development files]
 sane-utils - API library for scanners -- utilities
Changes: 
 sane-backends (1.0.12-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * 21_gt68xx_uhci_fixes.dpatch : fix timeout with UHCI host controllers.
   * debian/control:
     + Added temporary Build-Dependency on gcc-3.3 (>= 3.3.1-0pre0), which should
       fix the ICE on m68k.
   * debian/rules:
     + Should build with -O2 on m68k again.
Files: 
 2516b45e908e9a51492feee274fbcf43 833 graphics optional sane-backends_1.0.12-5.dsc
 e42336c1e53f60c26e411b3027a22e63 85314 graphics optional sane-backends_1.0.12-5.diff.gz
 75efb5f41bc62f7329c734df98e9c62d 89064 graphics optional sane-utils_1.0.12-5_i386.deb
 5b3ae10fe455f077debc07534d545247 2077868 libs optional libsane_1.0.12-5_i386.deb
 cf2675f6d3caddd7999a7ebd76e8da0f 1742620 libdevel optional libsane-dev_1.0.12-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ArBezWFP1/XWUWkRAuNqAJ9ZLOvhYjlw6vEtOnvjb6jHzU3gpgCfdnoQ
tTPwNrqIwUKiSiBafyuDH5A=
=2rg6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libsane-dev_1.0.12-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sane-backends/libsane-dev_1.0.12-5_i386.deb
libsane_1.0.12-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sane-backends/libsane_1.0.12-5_i386.deb
sane-backends_1.0.12-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sane-backends/sane-backends_1.0.12-5.diff.gz
sane-backends_1.0.12-5.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sane-backends/sane-backends_1.0.12-5.dsc
sane-utils_1.0.12-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sane-backends/sane-utils_1.0.12-5_i386.deb



Reply to: