[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ekg 20030504-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  5 May 2003 13:25:39 +0200
Source: ekg
Binary: libgadu2 ekg libgadu-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20030504-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany <porridge@debian.org>
Changed-By: Marcin Owsiany <porridge@debian.org>
Description: 
 ekg        - Console Gadu Gadu client for UNIX systems
 libgadu-dev - Gadu-Gadu protocol library - development files
 libgadu2   - Gadu-Gadu protocol library - runtime files
Changes: 
 ekg (20030504-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * New upstream snapshot (we skip 1.0 hoping that sarge will be frozen after
     1.1 is released)
   * Urgency high because it includes a security fix (DoS via DCC)
   * Add optimization flag to CFLAGS_LIBGADU (upstream configure.in changed)
Files: 
 a9216c8778c3741bfae7520e8bdec438 681 net optional ekg_20030504-1.dsc
 33cc49923f78429a59dfa4f6d2374081 426709 net optional ekg_20030504.orig.tar.gz
 621170402a2048f7fb5129c035e4a296 27622 net optional ekg_20030504-1.diff.gz
 89f9ef6f05c289e8c40b6df384b73b4a 201150 net optional ekg_20030504-1_i386.deb
 1463bfdb912f544625977d543f06699e 99520 libdevel optional libgadu-dev_20030504-1_i386.deb
 a01314f93b82e0221af1d7aaa29d6ca4 45330 libs optional libgadu2_20030504-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+tlgNOg2KoGD0EhYRAkHEAJ9GK4vctz0doNuuMJqBalKjtlOUTwCeOc3Z
8uoM4P6uCOnoKMwsYhxqdg0=
=ccSt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
ekg_20030504-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/ekg/ekg_20030504-1.diff.gz
ekg_20030504-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/ekg/ekg_20030504-1.dsc
ekg_20030504-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/ekg/ekg_20030504-1_i386.deb
ekg_20030504.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/ekg/ekg_20030504.orig.tar.gz
libgadu-dev_20030504-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/ekg/libgadu-dev_20030504-1_i386.deb
libgadu2_20030504-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/ekg/libgadu2_20030504-1_i386.deb



Reply to: