[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted libxml++ 0.20.0-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2003 13:40:00 +0200
Source: libxml++
Binary: libxml++0-dev libxml++0-doc libxml++0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.20.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Leishman <masklin@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Leishman <masklin@debian.org>
Description: 
 libxml++0  - A C++ interface to the GNOME XML library (libxml2)
 libxml++0-dev - A C++ interface to the GNOME XML library (libxml2)
 libxml++0-doc - HTML interface documentation and examples for libxml++
Closes: 179072
Changes: 
 libxml++ (0.20.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version 0.20.0
Files: 
 e9f5e75452f62ce6ff88d3333de5e627 674 devel optional libxml++_0.20.0-1.dsc
 b1754a61f98035a888dd0279d11c7280 230715 devel optional libxml++_0.20.0.orig.tar.gz
 e62f71239dc25e4753ec51a693da78de 3431 devel optional libxml++_0.20.0-1.diff.gz
 cc732a9dac13c0af543a8f93ad5d617f 42022 devel optional libxml++0-dev_0.20.0-1_i386.deb
 d058301d16ecef80a0bbbc8a9a3e590f 28182 libs optional libxml++0_0.20.0-1_i386.deb
 9388d4c2aa31a801c100b1fd18972195 31104 devel optional libxml++0-doc_0.20.0-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj5m/MwACgkQlBjBIrTiQhljMwCfaWdINW+j8QcRgv8Y9WClGDbi
kGIAn1+HW7WZKMuw2AcCCHsn6PORUYb+
=9enb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libxml++0-dev_0.20.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libxml++/libxml++0-dev_0.20.0-1_i386.deb
libxml++0-doc_0.20.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libxml++/libxml++0-doc_0.20.0-1_i386.deb
libxml++0_0.20.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libxml++/libxml++0_0.20.0-1_i386.deb
libxml++_0.20.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libx/libxml++/libxml++_0.20.0-1.diff.gz
libxml++_0.20.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libx/libxml++/libxml++_0.20.0-1.dsc
libxml++_0.20.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libx/libxml++/libxml++_0.20.0.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: