[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted flex 2.5.4a-30 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  9 Feb 2003 13:38:32 -0600
Source: flex
Binary: flex-doc flex
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.5.4a-30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org>
Description: 
 flex       - A fast lexical analyzer generator.
 flex-doc   - Documentation for flex (a fast lexical analyzer generator)
Closes: 173943 174259 174350 180051
Changes: 
 flex (2.5.4a-30) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * FlexLexer.h now include iostream, not iostream.h.
                                                  closes: Bug#173943, Bug#180051
   * Fix broken printf format                                 closes: Bug#174350
   * The behaviour of flex was different based on what order options were
     specified: option nomain before option noyywrap caused one set of
     behaviours, reversing the order changes the behavious, since nomain
     seemed to reset noyywrap. This was fixed in scanl. and initscan.c.
                                                              closes: Bug#174259
Files: 
 f6120c9bdf435034ef85aa9089962a14 616 devel standard flex_2.5.4a-30.dsc
 110322fa289d5c7b72e83a9ae3d73d77 74856 devel standard flex_2.5.4a-30.diff.gz
 1ac72b91360f3d95a27c8d68f4a93fe9 72052 doc optional flex-doc_2.5.4a-30_all.deb
 a2506efd17044631dfe2afada7aca11e 183452 devel standard flex_2.5.4a-30_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+Rq54Ibrau78kQkwRAoRFAJwP5uCVz0UtyMTJgGUAlBxN74gjTwCfcQvU
rHRsxSZkacQ+Hv7b5jkqnuA=
=WUv3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
flex-doc_2.5.4a-30_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/flex/flex-doc_2.5.4a-30_all.deb
flex_2.5.4a-30.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/flex/flex_2.5.4a-30.diff.gz
flex_2.5.4a-30.dsc
  to pool/main/f/flex/flex_2.5.4a-30.dsc
flex_2.5.4a-30_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flex/flex_2.5.4a-30_i386.deb



Reply to: