[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rancid 2.2.2-11 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  2 Feb 2003 11:16:45 +0100
Source: rancid
Binary: rancid-installer rancid-util rancid-cgi rancid-core
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.2.2-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@debian.org>
Changed-By: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@debian.org>
Description: 
 rancid-cgi - CGI for rancid
 rancid-core - rancid -- Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
 rancid-installer - Installer for Rancid suite on non i386 machine
 rancid-util - Utilities for rancid
Changes: 
 rancid (2.2.2-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Moved rancid-installer to non-free/net
Files: 
 36955fb8eed7ec16f713ee2bb13d731e 653 non-free/net optional rancid_2.2.2-11.dsc
 d371244825ba68c91773577e9b987a7e 35109 non-free/net optional rancid_2.2.2-11.diff.gz
 00f8a75547ddfb4fc6a17ba05d452ffa 120490 non-free/net optional rancid-core_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
 a1dd9ec7a4003d17857b10643f75e3bc 24600 non-free/net optional rancid-util_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
 3cc12f6fcd619400ccb56567e0ac9579 31414 non-free/net optional rancid-cgi_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
 76ee2921cd81354ceafb341191c51297 11356 non-free/net optional rancid-installer_2.2.2-11_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+PPhrzvFcH/JZfgQRAmGmAJ4+YwmFVsXRH4zLC0tld0Alde4BNQCdGWA3
5QilMut8r7FvONzN113p5Ho=
=EYvE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
rancid-cgi_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/r/rancid/rancid-cgi_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
rancid-core_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/r/rancid/rancid-core_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
rancid-installer_2.2.2-11_all.deb
  to pool/non-free/r/rancid/rancid-installer_2.2.2-11_all.deb
rancid-util_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/r/rancid/rancid-util_2.2.2-11_i386.deb
rancid_2.2.2-11.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/r/rancid/rancid_2.2.2-11.diff.gz
rancid_2.2.2-11.dsc
  to pool/non-free/r/rancid/rancid_2.2.2-11.dsc



Reply to: