[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted tramp 1:2.0.28-1 (all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 Jan 2003 09:41:01 +1100
Source: tramp
Binary: tramp
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:2.0.28-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
Changed-By: Angus Lees <gus@debian.org>
Description: 
 tramp      - Remote file access in emacs
Closes: 159815 174149
Changes: 
 tramp (1:2.0.28-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release, closes: #174149
   * Removed -n from dh_installinfo invocation and hardcoded install-info
     call in postinst/prerm.
     - only difference in result is section case (emacs vs Emacs).
       install-info treats section regex case-insensitively anyway.
   * debian/rules clean now does a $(MAKE) realclean.  Removed Makefile
     patch to achieve same.
   * debian/rules now only calls toplevel Makefile, which should fix tramp.info
     embedded version number.
   * Suggest smbclient, since tramp now does smb too.
   * Respect upstream tramp-default-method and stop modifying our conffile.
     Really closes: #159815
   * Added myself to Uploaders, with Ola's permission.
Files: 
 d261422e8956fb8366a3bd0e40c1e27f 621 editors optional tramp_2.0.28-1.dsc
 6d694c60daf052e65ce094e490295645 332322 editors optional tramp_2.0.28.orig.tar.gz
 cd8b77599d38720a07b566f3584b3865 6260 editors optional tramp_2.0.28-1.diff.gz
 522cd547498a7be14a18c44b78ef5381 148884 editors optional tramp_2.0.28-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+FMZHg//Ie9Avh3MRAqXeAKCc8F8mfsaDrvvzgb0g0IFgIFLYwwCgiOdG
mBf7/6rNBXjtxMpxyneIJiE=
=LD7U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
tramp_2.0.28-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tramp/tramp_2.0.28-1.diff.gz
tramp_2.0.28-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tramp/tramp_2.0.28-1.dsc
tramp_2.0.28-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tramp/tramp_2.0.28-1_all.deb
tramp_2.0.28.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tramp/tramp_2.0.28.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: