Accepted ircd-ircu 2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 10:53:00 +0100
Source: ircd-ircu
Binary: ircd-ircu
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Loschwitz <madkiss@madkiss.org>
Changed-By: Martin Loschwitz <madkiss@madkiss.org>
Description:
ircd-ircu - Undernet IRC Server daemon
Closes: 166644
Changes:
ircd-ircu (2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/rules: We use dpatch to handle patches now
* debian/rules: Use gcc-3.2 as standard
* debian/control: Added build-dependency for gcc-3.2
* debian/changelog: New upstream version
* debian/control: renamed package to ircd-ircu (Closes: #166644)
* debian/control: Updated Standards-Version
* debian/config: removed debconf-note
* debian/rules: different cleanups
* debian/{postinst,preinst} removed
* various other changes and updates
* fixed some more errors found by Gergely Nagy
Files:
87eb5006faf72ea1c1867acb1a6641f9 638 net optional ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1.dsc
bd9d427f6fee56cf9de92071479d84b0 773617 net optional ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101.orig.tar.gz
a3ab924ba9d6785533c3b9cdbd9593cb 17850 net optional ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1.diff.gz
7140305200cf2d9369cf3b5e24b29e88 570488 net optional ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9wl12LkAIIn9ODhERAkifAKCpYSuTFD2uVp3M/lZzHtJb80cB2wCggw2b
LBU0m4ZSWQ4gqY8yGX5O+Gw=
=riJZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/i/ircd-ircu/ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1.diff.gz
ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1.dsc
to pool/main/i/ircd-ircu/ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1.dsc
ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/i/ircd-ircu/ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101-1_i386.deb
ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/ircd-ircu/ircd-ircu_2.10.11.02+cvs.20021101.orig.tar.gz
Reply to: