[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pcmcia-cs 3.2.2-1 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  4 Nov 2002 08:59:14 -0500
Source: pcmcia-cs
Binary: pcmcia-source pcmcia-cs
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>
Changed-By: Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>
Description: 
 pcmcia-cs  - PCMCIA Card Services for Linux.
 pcmcia-source - PCMCIA Card Services source.
Closes: 159759 167326 167657 167663
Changes: 
 pcmcia-cs (3.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version.
   * Fixed syntax errors in cardmgr/yacc_config.y.  (Closes: Bug#167326)
   * Removed patch from Chung-chieh Shan <ken@digitas.harvard.edu>
     since it was not compatible with 2.2 kernels.  (Closes: Bug#159759)
   * Fixed lspnp to look for pnp.ids database in /usr/share/misc.
     (Closes: Bug#167657)
   * Network script now calls whereami during stop.  (Closes: Bug#167663)
Files: 
 c4c6620584b7afb57ec2ead14c02fd04 600 base extra pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1.dsc
 47d46e58a57ccbcaf61ed0549b2b8ed4 1254958 base extra pcmcia-cs_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz
 b668ba027372d68e45c1707fbcb18417 91645 base extra pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1.diff.gz
 00122a21c88c38dca7fbc7b6d0f9e495 1043514 admin extra pcmcia-source_3.2.2-1_all.deb
 f75fa7e5723dce64c472989fd53e8bee 273898 base extra pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9xqv6GfbHvThXxNoRAuMRAJ9obyZUV2TyYMlnELJdmrrRRxu2+gCfaeqQ
uD2MXirmuyelsvTlw5A37rI=
=dPzf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pcmcia-cs/pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1.diff.gz
pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pcmcia-cs/pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1.dsc
pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcmcia-cs/pcmcia-cs_3.2.2-1_i386.deb
pcmcia-cs_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pcmcia-cs/pcmcia-cs_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz
pcmcia-source_3.2.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcmcia-cs/pcmcia-source_3.2.2-1_all.deb



Reply to: