[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted xtrlock 2.0-7 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  1 Sep 2002 14:49:26 +1000
Source: xtrlock
Binary: xtrlock
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Mitchell <martin@debian.org>
Changed-By: Martin Mitchell <martin@debian.org>
Description: 
 xtrlock    - Minimal X display lock program
Closes: 154738 154740
Changes: 
 xtrlock (2.0-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Maintainer upload.
   * Update to standards version 3.5.6.
   * Removes buffer overrun potentiality (closes: #154738)
   * Drop setgid privileges (closes: #154740)
Files: 
 82debb25b3d3f2617b3a4f97c25a7720 1186 x11 optional xtrlock_2.0-7.dsc
 f026c9a4ce9a018469f5d0177e86c04c 7223 x11 optional xtrlock_2.0-7.tar.gz
 6846a7876686e7b0fd146763c9cda66e 8968 x11 optional xtrlock_2.0-7_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=eAfn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
xtrlock_2.0-7.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xtrlock/xtrlock_2.0-7.dsc
xtrlock_2.0-7.tar.gz
  to pool/main/x/xtrlock/xtrlock_2.0-7.tar.gz
xtrlock_2.0-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xtrlock/xtrlock_2.0-7_i386.deb



Reply to: