[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted fdutils 5.4-20020222-2 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  4 Jun 2002 19:34:09 +0200
Source: fdutils
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4-20020222-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss <voss@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jochen Voss <voss@debian.org>
Description: 
 fdutils    - Linux floppy utilities
Closes: 79618 110225 124365
Changes: 
 fdutils (5.4-20020222-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * superformat: use /dev/floppy/%d instead of /dev/fd%d on
     devfs-systems.  I cannot test this myself, so please
     check and report any remaining problems. (Closes: #110225)
 .
 fdutils (5.4-20020222-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (bug fixes)
   * Add support for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to debian/rules
   * Incorporate patch from John. R. Daily (Closes: #124365)
 .
 fdutils (5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #79618).
     It comes late, but here it is.
Files: 
 6f7ffd4e2f6fa2be126429d1a6f59290 605 base optional fdutils_5.4-20020222-2.dsc
 9f6453fd9f01931b61d8b34db0976cc5 23446 base optional fdutils_5.4-20020222-2.diff.gz
 327f2d336c5a9ed3008c64a77567241c 340460 base optional fdutils_5.4-20020222-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE8/Pxef+iD8yEbECURAoU3AJ9y+AqVCSWLGkGubzk3/OflskY3OACg2Jqr
TX2REPepiqR6LBEzBerVuWc=
=StrF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
fdutils_5.4-20020222-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/fdutils/fdutils_5.4-20020222-2.diff.gz
fdutils_5.4-20020222-2.dsc
  to pool/main/f/fdutils/fdutils_5.4-20020222-2.dsc
fdutils_5.4-20020222-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/fdutils/fdutils_5.4-20020222-2_i386.deb
fdutils_5.4-20020222.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/f/fdutils/fdutils_5.4-20020222.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: