[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted jwhois 3.2.0-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 18:15:00 +0100
Source: jwhois
Binary: jwhois
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: peter karlsson <peterk@debian.org>
Changed-By: peter karlsson <peterk@debian.org>
Description: 
 jwhois     - Improved Caching Whois client
Closes: 137088 137397 138488 139877 140279 141817 141818 141819 141822 141828 141833 141961 142181 142183 142384 143050 143184 143190 143191 143201
Changes: 
 jwhois (3.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release:
    - Changes to default configuration.
     (Closes: Bug#137088, #138488, #139877, #140279, #141817, #141818,
              Bug#141819, #141822, #141828, #141833, #141961, #142181,
              Bug#142183, #142384, #143050, #143184, #143190, #143191,
              Bug#143201)
    - Added advanced rewriting of queries.
     (Closes: Bug#137397)
Files: 
 c428b2b77c9c940ced0ad82e7a20a69a 628 net optional jwhois_3.2.0-1.dsc
 d2b301901aaa924d5e372a5a299ac699 361144 net optional jwhois_3.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 bb95900b4e4171f328e1d489b20d10e6 20 net optional jwhois_3.2.0-1.diff.gz
 16a6ea2328b5d2b74d284018d57c9a86 66052 net optional jwhois_3.2.0-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: För information se http://www.gnupg.org/

iD8DBQE80Xi0kryUdmOUJl4RAl9XAJwOvMM+ix6yzK7EJSc0MgiirUlclACffsNb
YlqpV311P3vtwdpjgtiGatU=
=YFx1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
jwhois_3.2.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/j/jwhois/jwhois_3.2.0-1.diff.gz
jwhois_3.2.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/j/jwhois/jwhois_3.2.0-1.dsc
jwhois_3.2.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/j/jwhois/jwhois_3.2.0-1_i386.deb
jwhois_3.2.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/j/jwhois/jwhois_3.2.0.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: